<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Limits: Local Ordinances Restrict Pet Ownership</title>
	<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545</link>
	<description>Essential news for cats, dogs and pet owners.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: C Platts</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-229941</link>
		<author>C Platts</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-229941</guid>
		<description>To Charles Magruder. I'm sorry about your experience with outside cats. Some people get pets and believe they should live outside. For each uncaring owner who does that I assure you there are a dozen of us who wouldn't think of allowing our pets out to fend for themselves on the streets. We live in a pet limit city where we can only have 2 cats or dogs. We also have a large college population and with the foreclosure rate the stray/abandon situation is unbelievable. This year we have had 5 cats living under our porch. We've managed to trap all but one and get them to no kill shelters but the shelters are overloaded and desperate for foster homes. It breaks your heart when you can't take in a few more cats as fosters until homes can be found but if we were to do that and get reported we'd have less than a week to reduce our pet number to 2, Even feeding the 'throw-aways' outside is risky because if they're in your yard they can cite you too. I don't know if your keighbor is feeding strays or all those cats are cats he went out and brought home so I can't judge him. If they are strays maybe you and your neighbors need to get in touch with one of the many organizations that deal with 'wild' cats I recomend Alley Cat Allies for more info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Charles Magruder. I&#8217;m sorry about your experience with outside cats. Some people get pets and believe they should live outside. For each uncaring owner who does that I assure you there are a dozen of us who wouldn&#8217;t think of allowing our pets out to fend for themselves on the streets. We live in a pet limit city where we can only have 2 cats or dogs. We also have a large college population and with the foreclosure rate the stray/abandon situation is unbelievable. This year we have had 5 cats living under our porch. We&#8217;ve managed to trap all but one and get them to no kill shelters but the shelters are overloaded and desperate for foster homes. It breaks your heart when you can&#8217;t take in a few more cats as fosters until homes can be found but if we were to do that and get reported we&#8217;d have less than a week to reduce our pet number to 2, Even feeding the &#8216;throw-aways&#8217; outside is risky because if they&#8217;re in your yard they can cite you too. I don&#8217;t know if your keighbor is feeding strays or all those cats are cats he went out and brought home so I can&#8217;t judge him. If they are strays maybe you and your neighbors need to get in touch with one of the many organizations that deal with &#8216;wild&#8217; cats I recomend Alley Cat Allies for more info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-195706</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-195706</guid>
		<description>pick up after your dog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pick up after your dog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Magruder</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-177683</link>
		<author>Charles Magruder</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-177683</guid>
		<description>STOPPIT!!! There has to be some sanity. I thank the city for their ordinance. I currently have a neighbor who has no less than 20 cats. Yes, 20. 
He feeds them and that is where the care ends. These animals constantly dig and defecate on my property. They have breeched my crawlspace, they are
in no uncertain terms FERAL ANIMALS. 

There are places on my lawn that no longer grow due to the feline urine. There are cat deposits everywhere.

The Humane Society and the ASPCA say their hands are tied. All they can do is cite the guy and let him go on his merry way. If this site allows, I will 
add some pictures so you bleeding hearts can see the eye diseases, mange, battle scars, etc that these animals suffer on a daily basis. 

Yes, they are cute and cuddly - but this is CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

No proper care is given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOPPIT!!! There has to be some sanity. I thank the city for their ordinance. I currently have a neighbor who has no less than 20 cats. Yes, 20.<br />
He feeds them and that is where the care ends. These animals constantly dig and defecate on my property. They have breeched my crawlspace, they are<br />
in no uncertain terms FERAL ANIMALS. </p>
<p>There are places on my lawn that no longer grow due to the feline urine. There are cat deposits everywhere.</p>
<p>The Humane Society and the ASPCA say their hands are tied. All they can do is cite the guy and let him go on his merry way. If this site allows, I will<br />
add some pictures so you bleeding hearts can see the eye diseases, mange, battle scars, etc that these animals suffer on a daily basis. </p>
<p>Yes, they are cute and cuddly - but this is CRUELTY TO ANIMALS</p>
<p>No proper care is given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocelopotamus &#8212; Roundup: Dinosaur Corsage Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52993</link>
		<author>Ocelopotamus &#8212; Roundup: Dinosaur Corsage Edition</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52993</guid>
		<description>[...] has a post about the weirdly arbitrary local laws that limit how many pets people can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has a post about the weirdly arbitrary local laws that limit how many pets people can [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2CatMom</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52976</link>
		<author>2CatMom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52976</guid>
		<description>Sarah: I think my condo has a 2 cat limit.  They do not allow dogs.  However, there are any number of people (including board members) who have more than 2, but I'm not aware of anyone with more than 4. Somewhere be 1-100 there's a natural limit of how many cats can live comfortably in a given space.  But I don't want to be the one deciding that.

 I think as long as the cats don't create a problem for the neighbors, every one lets it alone.  After all we don't limit children, and the cats have yet to vandalize the elevators, or leave trash in the lobby.

Funny thing, one of the board members was having problem with smoke infiltration from another apartment and announced that the board was going to pass a rule saying that if someone's smoking bothered a neighbor, it could be prohibited.  Now you just know that this is a neighbor to neighbor dispute that's gotten way out of hand.

At the meeting they held to discuss this issue the turn out was mostly nonsmokers and a fair number of cat owners. Nonsmokers on the grounds that what you do in your apartment is your business unless specifically prohibited in the condo bylaws (takes a 66% approval rate).   The cat owners were concerned that if someone was allergic to a cat, the same type of rule could be forced on them by the board.  My favorite was a little old lady who stood up and said "you'll have to pry my cats out of my cold, dead arms."  

Needless to say, the board had to back down.  But I do think they were genuinely astonished by the pet owners.  We such a militant bunch, LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah: I think my condo has a 2 cat limit.  They do not allow dogs.  However, there are any number of people (including board members) who have more than 2, but I&#8217;m not aware of anyone with more than 4. Somewhere be 1-100 there&#8217;s a natural limit of how many cats can live comfortably in a given space.  But I don&#8217;t want to be the one deciding that.</p>
<p> I think as long as the cats don&#8217;t create a problem for the neighbors, every one lets it alone.  After all we don&#8217;t limit children, and the cats have yet to vandalize the elevators, or leave trash in the lobby.</p>
<p>Funny thing, one of the board members was having problem with smoke infiltration from another apartment and announced that the board was going to pass a rule saying that if someone&#8217;s smoking bothered a neighbor, it could be prohibited.  Now you just know that this is a neighbor to neighbor dispute that&#8217;s gotten way out of hand.</p>
<p>At the meeting they held to discuss this issue the turn out was mostly nonsmokers and a fair number of cat owners. Nonsmokers on the grounds that what you do in your apartment is your business unless specifically prohibited in the condo bylaws (takes a 66% approval rate).   The cat owners were concerned that if someone was allergic to a cat, the same type of rule could be forced on them by the board.  My favorite was a little old lady who stood up and said &#8220;you&#8217;ll have to pry my cats out of my cold, dead arms.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Needless to say, the board had to back down.  But I do think they were genuinely astonished by the pet owners.  We such a militant bunch, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52805</link>
		<author>Sarah</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52805</guid>
		<description>I live in a condo that has a 2-pet limit. It's extremely, extremely hard to find a condo or apartment that will even allow 2 ... I live in fear that someone will notice the extra faces peering out the window. I can understand limiting dogs in a community--between the barking and the owners that fail to pick up after their dogs, one could make an argument for limits--but I've never figured out why anyone would feel it necessary to limit indoor cats to 1-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a condo that has a 2-pet limit. It&#8217;s extremely, extremely hard to find a condo or apartment that will even allow 2 &#8230; I live in fear that someone will notice the extra faces peering out the window. I can understand limiting dogs in a community&#8211;between the barking and the owners that fail to pick up after their dogs, one could make an argument for limits&#8211;but I&#8217;ve never figured out why anyone would feel it necessary to limit indoor cats to 1-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2CatMom</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52798</link>
		<author>2CatMom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52798</guid>
		<description>That poor woman.  My heart goes out to her.  A small amount of authority in a small-minded person's hands can create some giant sized turds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That poor woman.  My heart goes out to her.  A small amount of authority in a small-minded person&#8217;s hands can create some giant sized turds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52770</link>
		<author>Nikki</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52770</guid>
		<description>Sara,

From what I gathered, this was a rather meek elderly woman who, like so many citizens, are easily intimidated by figures of authority. I think she was probably overcome by the situation and didn't know she had any recourse but to abide by the dictates of the animal control officer. I fault the A.C. officer and the the A.C. authority and not the woman. They should have been flexible enough to work with her; extend her more time; show her some compassion. They didn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara,</p>
<p>From what I gathered, this was a rather meek elderly woman who, like so many citizens, are easily intimidated by figures of authority. I think she was probably overcome by the situation and didn&#8217;t know she had any recourse but to abide by the dictates of the animal control officer. I fault the A.C. officer and the the A.C. authority and not the woman. They should have been flexible enough to work with her; extend her more time; show her some compassion. They didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52758</link>
		<author>Linda</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52758</guid>
		<description>I think it is best to avoid problems and just obey the ordinances and if one has a situation like the lady above with the elderly dog, then one should fight it or appeal or move if possible. I can't imagine living where owning animals are not encouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is best to avoid problems and just obey the ordinances and if one has a situation like the lady above with the elderly dog, then one should fight it or appeal or move if possible. I can&#8217;t imagine living where owning animals are not encouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonbeams</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52745</link>
		<author>Moonbeams</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52745</guid>
		<description>Oh so true. In Queens, New York, I believe that there is no limit on the number of pets one can have - all a person needs to do is make sure the place is clean and the animals cared for and exercised. Sounds good to me!

But, and I don't understand it, people who like to enforce rules will take animals away, even though they are properly cared for, only to euthanize them for the sake of everyone following the rules. 

Yet, when I have a video of an armed man with what looks like a 45 in the back of his baggy jeans (can see it when he bends down to pick up his tools) wanna be burglar who was at my door (my dogs barking deterred him) and want the Sheriff to see it - identify this 19 year old looking thug who is canvassing my neighborhood with his breaking and entering tool bag - the dispatch officer says to me "Well, he's gone now and didn't break in so what is YOUR problem?"

Go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh so true. In Queens, New York, I believe that there is no limit on the number of pets one can have - all a person needs to do is make sure the place is clean and the animals cared for and exercised. Sounds good to me!</p>
<p>But, and I don&#8217;t understand it, people who like to enforce rules will take animals away, even though they are properly cared for, only to euthanize them for the sake of everyone following the rules. </p>
<p>Yet, when I have a video of an armed man with what looks like a 45 in the back of his baggy jeans (can see it when he bends down to pick up his tools) wanna be burglar who was at my door (my dogs barking deterred him) and want the Sheriff to see it - identify this 19 year old looking thug who is canvassing my neighborhood with his breaking and entering tool bag - the dispatch officer says to me &#8220;Well, he&#8217;s gone now and didn&#8217;t break in so what is YOUR problem?&#8221;</p>
<p>Go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mittens</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52729</link>
		<author>mittens</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52729</guid>
		<description>completely ridiculous- another way for people to just outright control others- whether it's a local ordinance or a condo rule. people love to have power over other people.

 it's very simple- have a leash law, take away animals from those who are abusing or hoarding them. take away dogs from people who let them roam destructively free. but no- that would be logical and doesn't give you enough control over other people. we need more enforcement of concise, effective, need based laws not more invasive laws clearly biased against responsible pet ownership.

i ended up with 6 cats and none of it was of my own doing. i had one little cat-but  successive waves of roommates  moved out and left their cats. 2 i rescued from a cardboard box on the street and one i took in because a friend bought a condo and found out after they wouldn't allow her indoor cat. i couldn't bear to turn them away. i would in fact never have dreamed of it even though i had never considered having a cat herd. 

people who have more than 3 cats or dogs are generally good people with big hearts- are we going to punish them for saving animals and providing them with safe homes? there are less restrictive laws on child rapers. convicted murderers are actually let out on work release in our communities. it is criminalizing the best aspect of any society- charity toward the less fortunate. we'd be better served if we more pointedly punished evil doers-real criminals, enforced simple rules encouraging to good humane SANE pet ownership and made government mind it's own damn business unless real destructiveness or cruelty is involved.

another example of the tyranny of the 'moral' minority- those who feel the need to inflict their views and preferences on others even within the alleged sanctity of one's own home. it's all about control.

if we had such an ordinance here, i'd give up my" extra" cats the day government forces those wise ass crack babies( on these really small bikes no less. these kids arent out of their teens) peddling drugs and pimping women from living in my neighborhood . no more than one gang banging lowlife scumbag per block please... or the extras will have to be put down. and neuter or spay don't delay! they definitely should be tagged too and actually once arresting them might help ,Officer Friendly. my over indulged prissy himalayan, yawning on a pillow in the window, believe it or not, is not the one selling crack to the kids at the middle school nor does she drive down the street spraying bullets into gangs of rival persians.( although i am not entirely sure she hasn't at least considered the latter.)

but it's so like government, when faced with real crime it hasn't a clue nor the will to control ,to turn its attention to those who are committing no crime and are law abiding- just because they are law abiding. they will comply or worry about being found out  because they are respectful citizens. there's much less physical and political danger pushing around crazy cat ladies and lap dog petters then going after people with guns who actually hurt others and don't care about any laws whatsoever.

we have to make them fear for their political future if they continue to pass draconian laws addressing no actual crime. fear the crazy cat ladies and pit bull lovers.. fear them or no re-election, no political contributions, no peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>completely ridiculous- another way for people to just outright control others- whether it&#8217;s a local ordinance or a condo rule. people love to have power over other people.</p>
<p> it&#8217;s very simple- have a leash law, take away animals from those who are abusing or hoarding them. take away dogs from people who let them roam destructively free. but no- that would be logical and doesn&#8217;t give you enough control over other people. we need more enforcement of concise, effective, need based laws not more invasive laws clearly biased against responsible pet ownership.</p>
<p>i ended up with 6 cats and none of it was of my own doing. i had one little cat-but  successive waves of roommates  moved out and left their cats. 2 i rescued from a cardboard box on the street and one i took in because a friend bought a condo and found out after they wouldn&#8217;t allow her indoor cat. i couldn&#8217;t bear to turn them away. i would in fact never have dreamed of it even though i had never considered having a cat herd. </p>
<p>people who have more than 3 cats or dogs are generally good people with big hearts- are we going to punish them for saving animals and providing them with safe homes? there are less restrictive laws on child rapers. convicted murderers are actually let out on work release in our communities. it is criminalizing the best aspect of any society- charity toward the less fortunate. we&#8217;d be better served if we more pointedly punished evil doers-real criminals, enforced simple rules encouraging to good humane SANE pet ownership and made government mind it&#8217;s own damn business unless real destructiveness or cruelty is involved.</p>
<p>another example of the tyranny of the &#8216;moral&#8217; minority- those who feel the need to inflict their views and preferences on others even within the alleged sanctity of one&#8217;s own home. it&#8217;s all about control.</p>
<p>if we had such an ordinance here, i&#8217;d give up my&#8221; extra&#8221; cats the day government forces those wise ass crack babies( on these really small bikes no less. these kids arent out of their teens) peddling drugs and pimping women from living in my neighborhood . no more than one gang banging lowlife scumbag per block please&#8230; or the extras will have to be put down. and neuter or spay don&#8217;t delay! they definitely should be tagged too and actually once arresting them might help ,Officer Friendly. my over indulged prissy himalayan, yawning on a pillow in the window, believe it or not, is not the one selling crack to the kids at the middle school nor does she drive down the street spraying bullets into gangs of rival persians.( although i am not entirely sure she hasn&#8217;t at least considered the latter.)</p>
<p>but it&#8217;s so like government, when faced with real crime it hasn&#8217;t a clue nor the will to control ,to turn its attention to those who are committing no crime and are law abiding- just because they are law abiding. they will comply or worry about being found out  because they are respectful citizens. there&#8217;s much less physical and political danger pushing around crazy cat ladies and lap dog petters then going after people with guns who actually hurt others and don&#8217;t care about any laws whatsoever.</p>
<p>we have to make them fear for their political future if they continue to pass draconian laws addressing no actual crime. fear the crazy cat ladies and pit bull lovers.. fear them or no re-election, no political contributions, no peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52726</link>
		<author>Sara</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52726</guid>
		<description>Nikki - oh that is so sad. I have a peeping tom neighbor that for many reasons drives me up a wall. I do my best to keep my dogs quiet so as not to force any problem.

Usually, a person can go to court and get an extension of time - and then again she doesn't have to let animal control in her house. There were things she could have done but she just "gave" in - sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikki - oh that is so sad. I have a peeping tom neighbor that for many reasons drives me up a wall. I do my best to keep my dogs quiet so as not to force any problem.</p>
<p>Usually, a person can go to court and get an extension of time - and then again she doesn&#8217;t have to let animal control in her house. There were things she could have done but she just &#8220;gave&#8221; in - sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52689</link>
		<author>Nikki</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52689</guid>
		<description>Pet limit ordinances have been successfully challenged in a couple cases and were, in both cases, found by a higher court to be unconstitutional. 

http://www.nokillnow.com/petlimitlawunconst.htm

Here in San Jose, CA prior to 2005 it was "illegal" to have more than two adult dogs in a single dwelling. The current ordinance allows a total of 5 cats/dogs, with no more than 3 allowed of any one species). And while the pet limit ordinance is not "actively" enforced, AC will act on specific complaints by citizens. I recently heard of one devastating case of a woman whose animal-hating neighbor complained about her four dogs. AC arrived at her home and told her she had 24 hours to get rid of one of the dogs or else be in violation of the ordinance. The poor woman was forced to put to sleep her oldest dog in order to comply, as she could find no one in such a short time frame who would take one of her dogs for her. I wish she'd had the resources to fight the ordinance and take San Jose to court. I've myself written to some legal resources who claim to advocate on behalf of animals, asking for help in getting this ordinance changed or in filing a lawsuit against the city. Not surprisingly, none of the orgs I contacted for help have ever responded...not even so much as a form letter or auto-reply email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pet limit ordinances have been successfully challenged in a couple cases and were, in both cases, found by a higher court to be unconstitutional. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nokillnow.com/petlimitlawunconst.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nokillnow.com/petlimitlawunconst.htm</a></p>
<p>Here in San Jose, CA prior to 2005 it was &#8220;illegal&#8221; to have more than two adult dogs in a single dwelling. The current ordinance allows a total of 5 cats/dogs, with no more than 3 allowed of any one species). And while the pet limit ordinance is not &#8220;actively&#8221; enforced, AC will act on specific complaints by citizens. I recently heard of one devastating case of a woman whose animal-hating neighbor complained about her four dogs. AC arrived at her home and told her she had 24 hours to get rid of one of the dogs or else be in violation of the ordinance. The poor woman was forced to put to sleep her oldest dog in order to comply, as she could find no one in such a short time frame who would take one of her dogs for her. I wish she&#8217;d had the resources to fight the ordinance and take San Jose to court. I&#8217;ve myself written to some legal resources who claim to advocate on behalf of animals, asking for help in getting this ordinance changed or in filing a lawsuit against the city. Not surprisingly, none of the orgs I contacted for help have ever responded&#8230;not even so much as a form letter or auto-reply email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmilyS</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52649</link>
		<author>EmilyS</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52649</guid>
		<description>welcome to the world of state sponsored control of pets.

We pit bull people have always said our breed was just a stalking horse to enable more breed-based regulations, more care/feeding regulations, more insurance more health regulations (mandatory s/n anyone?) and so forth.

but personally, I DO believe that cats shouldn't have trespass rights that people don't have.  Indoors is the place for them to be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welcome to the world of state sponsored control of pets.</p>
<p>We pit bull people have always said our breed was just a stalking horse to enable more breed-based regulations, more care/feeding regulations, more insurance more health regulations (mandatory s/n anyone?) and so forth.</p>
<p>but personally, I DO believe that cats shouldn&#8217;t have trespass rights that people don&#8217;t have.  Indoors is the place for them to be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52640</link>
		<author>Sara</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/city-limits-local-ordinances-restrict-pet-ownership-2545#comment-52640</guid>
		<description>I am a dog lover and since I have a neighbor that doesn't like cats, I don't have a cat now, but I love cats too.

But, I keep my dogs on leashes and do not let them poop in my neighbors yards but if something does happen, by accident, I am so quick to clean it up.

Well, this woman who lived several blocks away would walk her dog past my garage where I keep one dog (in the backyard and in the garage - has free access) and my dog would bark at this woman and her dog through a small opening under the garage door. This inconsiderate woman would let her dog poop on my yard and then she'd carry this stranger poop up and put it in my trash can next to the garage door and she started training her dog obedience right at the end of my driveway every day that drove my dog nuts, by the way. It was awful. I planted cactus around my yard to keep her away and put my dog in the far back patio so she would stop taining her dog near my driveway. The bottom line - people are inconsiderate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a dog lover and since I have a neighbor that doesn&#8217;t like cats, I don&#8217;t have a cat now, but I love cats too.</p>
<p>But, I keep my dogs on leashes and do not let them poop in my neighbors yards but if something does happen, by accident, I am so quick to clean it up.</p>
<p>Well, this woman who lived several blocks away would walk her dog past my garage where I keep one dog (in the backyard and in the garage - has free access) and my dog would bark at this woman and her dog through a small opening under the garage door. This inconsiderate woman would let her dog poop on my yard and then she&#8217;d carry this stranger poop up and put it in my trash can next to the garage door and she started training her dog obedience right at the end of my driveway every day that drove my dog nuts, by the way. It was awful. I planted cactus around my yard to keep her away and put my dog in the far back patio so she would stop taining her dog near my driveway. The bottom line - people are inconsiderate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
