<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressional Panel Says FDA Dragging Their Feet On Answers</title>
	<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907</link>
	<description>Essential news for cats, dogs and pet owners.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: DMS</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24931</link>
		<author>DMS</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24931</guid>
		<description>What has become of the deadline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has become of the deadline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petslave</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24922</link>
		<author>petslave</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24922</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately rotenone is very commonly used in this country by various agencies to poison lakes &#38;, less often, streams, to optimize fishing.  It goes under the facinating name of lake rehabilitation.  

Our state (WA) used to do it very routinely until just recently when public outcry (&#38; probably more importantly the the finding that rotenone can affect male fertility) has stopped most of  the routine 'rehabilitations'.  I guess it was popular in earlier days for everyone to go to the lake while it was poisoned &#38; gather the poisoned fish as they floated to the top &#38; take them home to eat.  It was considered non-toxic to mammals then but I think that's changed some now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately rotenone is very commonly used in this country by various agencies to poison lakes &amp;, less often, streams, to optimize fishing.  It goes under the facinating name of lake rehabilitation.  </p>
<p>Our state (WA) used to do it very routinely until just recently when public outcry (&amp; probably more importantly the the finding that rotenone can affect male fertility) has stopped most of  the routine &#8216;rehabilitations&#8217;.  I guess it was popular in earlier days for everyone to go to the lake while it was poisoned &amp; gather the poisoned fish as they floated to the top &amp; take them home to eat.  It was considered non-toxic to mammals then but I think that&#8217;s changed some now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bw</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24739</link>
		<author>bw</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24739</guid>
		<description>Sorry to get off topic, but this is about poisoning animals and water, even though they are fish.
Is it just me or is this another mindbogglingly  STUPID decision from a federal agency.  The Fish and Wildlife Agency is approving the POISONING of a stream and 3 lakes in the headwaters of the Stillwater river in order to KILL one type of fish in order to protect another type of fish that are more popular with tourists.  So to increase tourism we are going to poison a little more water, and kill some more animals.  I cannot fathom such insanity, but maybe I am missing something "beneficial" here.

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070531/NEWS01/70531015
 
Wildlife official OKs fish poisoning


BILLINGS (AP) â€” A Fish, Wildlife and Parks regional supervisor has approved the poisoning of brook trout in a stream and three lakes at the headwaters of the Stillwater River to protect a nearby population of pure Yellowstone cutthroat trout. 

Region 5 supervisor Gary Hammond in Billings issued the decision notice Wednesday, approving the use of the chemical rotenone to eradicate the brook trout. The decision can be appealed to FWPâ€™s director. 


ADVERTISEMENT 
   
The project will target brook trout in Goose Creek and Huckleberry, Mutt and Jeff lakes to protect Yellowstone cutthroat in Goose Lake, which is inside the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness. The other three lakes are outside the wilderness boundary, but the six-mile section of Goose Creek proposed for treatment forms the wilderness boundary; and parts of it are inside the wilderness area.

The treatment area is about five miles north of Cooke City.

The lakes and creek would be restocked with Yellowstone cutthroat about a year after the poisoning.

Some groups, including American Wildlands and the Beartooth Alliance, voiced approval of the project. The Beartooth Alliance is an affiliate of the Northern Plains Resource Council based in Cooke City.

In a letter supporting the measure, Nellie Israel, chairwoman of the groupâ€™s board of directors, wrote: â€œWe feel that the restoration of a thriving Yellowstone cutthroat population would increase visitorsâ€™ enjoyment of the area and help stimulate economic growth in the future.â€

But the decision notice also contained complaints from other anglers and hikers who saw the project as unnecessary because the brook trout were thriving, and unacceptable in and near a wilderness area.

Brook trout are not native to the area and were likely stocked in the early 1930s. Itâ€™s not clear if the Goose Lake Yellowstone cutthroats are native, although it seems unlikely given the geography of the area.

Goose Lake now provides brood stock for the Yellowstone River Trout Hatchery at Big Timber. Wildlife officials would use some of the Goose Lake cutthroat trout fingerlings from Big Timber to restock the lakes and creek.

Goose Lake also provides fish for 68 other lakes in the Absaroka-Beartooth Mountains. Brook trout still occupy about 110 lakes in the mountain range. 
Goose Creek and Mutt and Jeff lakes should become a self-sustaining fishery, the agency said, while Huckleberry Lake would be restocked every three to four years because its spawning habitat is poor for cutthroats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to get off topic, but this is about poisoning animals and water, even though they are fish.<br />
Is it just me or is this another mindbogglingly  STUPID decision from a federal agency.  The Fish and Wildlife Agency is approving the POISONING of a stream and 3 lakes in the headwaters of the Stillwater river in order to KILL one type of fish in order to protect another type of fish that are more popular with tourists.  So to increase tourism we are going to poison a little more water, and kill some more animals.  I cannot fathom such insanity, but maybe I am missing something &#8220;beneficial&#8221; here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070531/NEWS01/70531015" rel="nofollow">http://www.greatfallstribune.c.....1/70531015</a></p>
<p>Wildlife official OKs fish poisoning</p>
<p>BILLINGS (AP) â€” A Fish, Wildlife and Parks regional supervisor has approved the poisoning of brook trout in a stream and three lakes at the headwaters of the Stillwater River to protect a nearby population of pure Yellowstone cutthroat trout. </p>
<p>Region 5 supervisor Gary Hammond in Billings issued the decision notice Wednesday, approving the use of the chemical rotenone to eradicate the brook trout. The decision can be appealed to FWPâ€™s director. </p>
<p>ADVERTISEMENT </p>
<p>The project will target brook trout in Goose Creek and Huckleberry, Mutt and Jeff lakes to protect Yellowstone cutthroat in Goose Lake, which is inside the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness. The other three lakes are outside the wilderness boundary, but the six-mile section of Goose Creek proposed for treatment forms the wilderness boundary; and parts of it are inside the wilderness area.</p>
<p>The treatment area is about five miles north of Cooke City.</p>
<p>The lakes and creek would be restocked with Yellowstone cutthroat about a year after the poisoning.</p>
<p>Some groups, including American Wildlands and the Beartooth Alliance, voiced approval of the project. The Beartooth Alliance is an affiliate of the Northern Plains Resource Council based in Cooke City.</p>
<p>In a letter supporting the measure, Nellie Israel, chairwoman of the groupâ€™s board of directors, wrote: â€œWe feel that the restoration of a thriving Yellowstone cutthroat population would increase visitorsâ€™ enjoyment of the area and help stimulate economic growth in the future.â€</p>
<p>But the decision notice also contained complaints from other anglers and hikers who saw the project as unnecessary because the brook trout were thriving, and unacceptable in and near a wilderness area.</p>
<p>Brook trout are not native to the area and were likely stocked in the early 1930s. Itâ€™s not clear if the Goose Lake Yellowstone cutthroats are native, although it seems unlikely given the geography of the area.</p>
<p>Goose Lake now provides brood stock for the Yellowstone River Trout Hatchery at Big Timber. Wildlife officials would use some of the Goose Lake cutthroat trout fingerlings from Big Timber to restock the lakes and creek.</p>
<p>Goose Lake also provides fish for 68 other lakes in the Absaroka-Beartooth Mountains. Brook trout still occupy about 110 lakes in the mountain range.<br />
Goose Creek and Mutt and Jeff lakes should become a self-sustaining fishery, the agency said, while Huckleberry Lake would be restocked every three to four years because its spawning habitat is poor for cutthroats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24718</link>
		<author>Susan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24718</guid>
		<description>Steve--I read that the $2.1 billion budget is a $105.8 million increase over last year. Of that increase, only $10.6 million goes towards strengthening food safety.
http://www.fda.gov/oc/oms/ofm/budget/2008/summary.html
I only begrudge some of them their raise. (Like the ones in bed with Duan-o.) Some are hardworking, decent people, like that vet who tried to pull the plug on ProHeart and got punished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8211;I read that the $2.1 billion budget is a $105.8 million increase over last year. Of that increase, only $10.6 million goes towards strengthening food safety.<br />
<a href="http://www.fda.gov/oc/oms/ofm/budget/2008/summary.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fda.gov/oc/oms/ofm/.....mmary.html</a><br />
I only begrudge some of them their raise. (Like the ones in bed with Duan-o.) Some are hardworking, decent people, like that vet who tried to pull the plug on ProHeart and got punished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24702</link>
		<author>Sharon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24702</guid>
		<description>Let's make them explain what that $2.1 Billion is buying. If it's not food safety then I want my money back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s make them explain what that $2.1 Billion is buying. If it&#8217;s not food safety then I want my money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straybaby</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24660</link>
		<author>straybaby</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24660</guid>
		<description>"Steve Says: 
May 31st, 2007 at 9:42 pm
The FDAâ€™s federal budget request for 2008 totalled $2.1 Billion."

i wonder if this will keep the lab closings from happenning . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Steve Says:<br />
May 31st, 2007 at 9:42 pm<br />
The FDAâ€™s federal budget request for 2008 totalled $2.1 Billion.&#8221;</p>
<p>i wonder if this will keep the lab closings from happenning . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchmo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recall Update: Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24630</link>
		<author>Itchmo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recall Update: Friday</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24630</guid>
		<description>[...] committee says FDA responses not sufficient. Sets a Friday deadline for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] committee says FDA responses not sufficient. Sets a Friday deadline for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YaYa</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24629</link>
		<author>YaYa</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24629</guid>
		<description>Hey, I have an Idea to Solve the Food fight!

How bout, WE KEEP OUR FOODS and THEY can KEEP THEIRS?!

Whadaya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I have an Idea to Solve the Food fight!</p>
<p>How bout, WE KEEP OUR FOODS and THEY can KEEP THEIRS?!</p>
<p>Whadaya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24615</link>
		<author>Sylvia</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24615</guid>
		<description>We are in a dysfunctional relationship with China - like the crazy, loud, alcoholic family on the block that all the other neighbors love to gossip about but avoid socially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are in a dysfunctional relationship with China - like the crazy, loud, alcoholic family on the block that all the other neighbors love to gossip about but avoid socially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24612</link>
		<author>Joan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24612</guid>
		<description>China comes out swinging in food fight

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2007-05-31-china-food-safety_N.htm

BEIJING â€” Chinese food exports to the USA are safer than U.S. food exports to the People's Republic of China, a government official claimed in Beijing Thursday, during a spirited defense of the country's food and drug safety system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China comes out swinging in food fight</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2007-05-31-china-food-safety_N.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/money/.....fety_N.htm</a></p>
<p>BEIJING â€” Chinese food exports to the USA are safer than U.S. food exports to the People&#8217;s Republic of China, a government official claimed in Beijing Thursday, during a spirited defense of the country&#8217;s food and drug safety system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24592</link>
		<author>Rick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24592</guid>
		<description>Maybe THIS is why the FDA are dragging their feet--from ABC News:
Avandia Critic Claims FDA Smear Campaign
Cardiologist 'Not Backing Down' After Alleged Media Attack by an FDA Spokesman.

The prominent cardiologist sounding alarms about the diabetes drug Avandia claims he is the target of a smear campaign organized by a top Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spokesman.

They've got their hands full trying to protect big pharma!

Rest of story:http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=3225419&#38;page=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe THIS is why the FDA are dragging their feet&#8211;from ABC News:<br />
Avandia Critic Claims FDA Smear Campaign<br />
Cardiologist &#8216;Not Backing Down&#8217; After Alleged Media Attack by an FDA Spokesman.</p>
<p>The prominent cardiologist sounding alarms about the diabetes drug Avandia claims he is the target of a smear campaign organized by a top Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spokesman.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got their hands full trying to protect big pharma!</p>
<p>Rest of story:http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=3225419&amp;page=1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24570</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24570</guid>
		<description>The FDA's federal budget request for 2008 totalled $2.1 Billion.

Taxpayer funded of course. If they can't get the basics together on that forget it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA&#8217;s federal budget request for 2008 totalled $2.1 Billion.</p>
<p>Taxpayer funded of course. If they can&#8217;t get the basics together on that forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flamin</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24557</link>
		<author>Flamin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24557</guid>
		<description>â€œprovides a deadline of June 1 for the answers. If the FDA does not meet that deadline, the committee will â€œconsider other options, including compulsory processâ€
7 hr countdown begins now.
-----------------
Where have I heard empty threats like this before. United Nations to Iran, North Korea perhaps.

I'm not holding my breath for this US congressional committee to do anything to the FDA. It's like the rooster guarding the hen house. Make that melahens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œprovides a deadline of June 1 for the answers. If the FDA does not meet that deadline, the committee will â€œconsider other options, including compulsory processâ€<br />
7 hr countdown begins now.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Where have I heard empty threats like this before. United Nations to Iran, North Korea perhaps.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not holding my breath for this US congressional committee to do anything to the FDA. It&#8217;s like the rooster guarding the hen house. Make that melahens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiki</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24556</link>
		<author>Kiki</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24556</guid>
		<description>FDA gets paid by drug companies...screwy system that everyone wants changed except the FDA.

http://tinyurl.com/39twoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDA gets paid by drug companies&#8230;screwy system that everyone wants changed except the FDA.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/39twoy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/39twoy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiki</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24552</link>
		<author>Kiki</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/congressional-panel-says-fdas-dragging-their-feet-on-answers-907#comment-24552</guid>
		<description>FDA budget for FY '08...which first starts with a hefty pay raise. How about using Bushes paradigm of "pay for performance". If used, the FDA would owe us a bunch of money, doncha think??

http://tinyurl.com/28ba4v</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDA budget for FY &#8216;08&#8230;which first starts with a hefty pay raise. How about using Bushes paradigm of &#8220;pay for performance&#8221;. If used, the FDA would owe us a bunch of money, doncha think??</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/28ba4v" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/28ba4v</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

