<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los Angeles Passes Pet Sterilization Law</title>
	<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808</link>
	<description>Essential news for cats, dogs and pet owners.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-127181</link>
		<author>Holly</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-127181</guid>
		<description>The best time doesn't really exist.  Minimally, at one year of age.  That way the hormones have some time to exist in the body, but really its not a lot.  The one article that I read that pertained to the link between early spay/neuter and bone cancer recommended to wait until 3 years of age, which gives the hormones ample time to flow through the body.

You can ask your breeder but some breeders want early spays because they are afraid of unwanted pregnancies.  If you take precautions when your dog is in heat, there should be no problems.  My young gsd is almost 2 and I am not going to even consider it til she is 3.  I may never do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best time doesn&#8217;t really exist.  Minimally, at one year of age.  That way the hormones have some time to exist in the body, but really its not a lot.  The one article that I read that pertained to the link between early spay/neuter and bone cancer recommended to wait until 3 years of age, which gives the hormones ample time to flow through the body.</p>
<p>You can ask your breeder but some breeders want early spays because they are afraid of unwanted pregnancies.  If you take precautions when your dog is in heat, there should be no problems.  My young gsd is almost 2 and I am not going to even consider it til she is 3.  I may never do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-127090</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-127090</guid>
		<description>Have your mom ask the breeder of her puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have your mom ask the breeder of her puppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefani</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126894</link>
		<author>Stefani</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126894</guid>
		<description>So, what is the ideal time to spay a dog you do not intend to breed?  My mom needs to spay her maltese pup.  Stef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what is the ideal time to spay a dog you do not intend to breed?  My mom needs to spay her maltese pup.  Stef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126879</link>
		<author>Holly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126879</guid>
		<description>oops.  Thanks for pointing that out Max.  It should be www.theavh.org  which stands for the acadamey of veterinary homeopathy.

I enjoyed your post Max and thought I would add to it.

H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops.  Thanks for pointing that out Max.  It should be <a href="http://www.theavh.org" rel="nofollow">www.theavh.org</a>  which stands for the acadamey of veterinary homeopathy.</p>
<p>I enjoyed your post Max and thought I would add to it.</p>
<p>H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126877</link>
		<author>Max</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126877</guid>
		<description>Holly -

appreciate your insight to the conversation about mandatory spay and neuter - I follow much of the same protocols for pet care as you do.

I believe the link you posted was supposed to be:

http://www.ahvma.org/

(the link that came through in your message was for a hospital in Jerusalem ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly -</p>
<p>appreciate your insight to the conversation about mandatory spay and neuter - I follow much of the same protocols for pet care as you do.</p>
<p>I believe the link you posted was supposed to be:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ahvma.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ahvma.org/</a></p>
<p>(the link that came through in your message was for a hospital in Jerusalem ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126874</link>
		<author>Holly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126874</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of problems associated with early spaying and neutering, not just cancer.  The problem with implementing these laws is that it is the responsible people who comply, usually regardless of the cost.  And those people who do not want to spay/neuter their pets are viewed as irresponsible when in fact they may be MORE responsible because they certainly have to work harder at ensuring their pet does not contribute to the overpopulation problem.  And then there are all the other people in between.  I think that education is the key but we can't even take care/help poor families, never mind the dogs and cats they try to keep.  

As a vet tech who has euthanized MANY loving cats and dogs, puppies and kittens, I can tell you that it is a horrible discovery to enter the world of veterinary medicine only to be ending the lives of such wonderful creatures because people are uneducated or they just don't give a dam.  I refused to euthanize healthy animals at the clinic where I worked.  They changed their policies and started increasing the fee for a euthanasia for someone who seemed to have no good reason or was not a regular client.  I ended up quitting the biz but I know that this only caused more animals to be dumped off at the local shelter, leaving them to deal with the problems.  I fully understand that those people who love and work with animals should not have to be a part of ending lives on a day to day basis, but early spay/neutering and making it a law is not going to work!

I don't know exactly what the right answer to the overpopulation problem is but forcing everyone to spay/neuter their pet with complete disregard for the pets overall well-being is wrong, not to mention violating my rights as a guardian to choose what is best for my pets.  Pets are considered to be property which is why these laws can come into place.  If we worked together to change how our pets are viewed, then perhaps we can change these crazy laws.

Veterinarians beliefs about spaying/neutering early is highly outdated.  Unfortunately many vets are not interested in new findings but rather stick to the old beliefs that spaying and neutering are healthier procedures if done before a year of age.  It is unfortunate that they don't delve into their studies of physiology because it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that eliminating the body of its god-given hormones will have a detrimental effect on it.  It's just a matter of time.

I used to be a good client for my vet because I did everything I was supposed to.  My pets were really unhealthy.  They suffered from allergies - severe, to cancer and everything else in between.  It was the reason I became a vet tech - to offset the vet bills but because I really believed as an animal nurse I could help.  My eyes were opened big time and my heart was broken over and over again.  Since then, I have discovered alternative health care and now I am not a good client.  I do the OPPOSITE of what my vet recommends!!  Lucky for me my vet "gets it" and is very supportive.  He is slowly going the alternative health route.  He sees my healthy pets that are not spayed, not neutered, not vaccinated, not fed dry kibble (only raw).  Actually he doesn't see them because they don't get sick enough to go to the vet.  My 15 1/2 year old lab cross goes for regular check ups, has gotten her teeth cleaned lately and is completely medication free.  She was spayed at 6 months but lucky for us and her, she is one of the rare success stories of modern medicine.  But she went alternative 9 years ago, so me thinks that is the secret to her longevity.  I treat with Homeopathy.  I am now a Homeopath.  I work with pets and people.

Anyhow, I encourage people to band together in your hometowns, find a vet you can work with and be your own pet's advocate.  And look into homeopathy because it is a gentle for of medicine.  Go to www.avh.org to find a vet near you.  A truly holistic vet would be a support system for fighting these crazy laws and supporting you on the no spay/neuter belief system.  What is really sad is that we have to PROVE that we are good pet guardians because we do not spay/neuter our pet.  It is assumed that we are negligent.  How sad.

H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of problems associated with early spaying and neutering, not just cancer.  The problem with implementing these laws is that it is the responsible people who comply, usually regardless of the cost.  And those people who do not want to spay/neuter their pets are viewed as irresponsible when in fact they may be MORE responsible because they certainly have to work harder at ensuring their pet does not contribute to the overpopulation problem.  And then there are all the other people in between.  I think that education is the key but we can&#8217;t even take care/help poor families, never mind the dogs and cats they try to keep.  </p>
<p>As a vet tech who has euthanized MANY loving cats and dogs, puppies and kittens, I can tell you that it is a horrible discovery to enter the world of veterinary medicine only to be ending the lives of such wonderful creatures because people are uneducated or they just don&#8217;t give a dam.  I refused to euthanize healthy animals at the clinic where I worked.  They changed their policies and started increasing the fee for a euthanasia for someone who seemed to have no good reason or was not a regular client.  I ended up quitting the biz but I know that this only caused more animals to be dumped off at the local shelter, leaving them to deal with the problems.  I fully understand that those people who love and work with animals should not have to be a part of ending lives on a day to day basis, but early spay/neutering and making it a law is not going to work!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know exactly what the right answer to the overpopulation problem is but forcing everyone to spay/neuter their pet with complete disregard for the pets overall well-being is wrong, not to mention violating my rights as a guardian to choose what is best for my pets.  Pets are considered to be property which is why these laws can come into place.  If we worked together to change how our pets are viewed, then perhaps we can change these crazy laws.</p>
<p>Veterinarians beliefs about spaying/neutering early is highly outdated.  Unfortunately many vets are not interested in new findings but rather stick to the old beliefs that spaying and neutering are healthier procedures if done before a year of age.  It is unfortunate that they don&#8217;t delve into their studies of physiology because it doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to understand that eliminating the body of its god-given hormones will have a detrimental effect on it.  It&#8217;s just a matter of time.</p>
<p>I used to be a good client for my vet because I did everything I was supposed to.  My pets were really unhealthy.  They suffered from allergies - severe, to cancer and everything else in between.  It was the reason I became a vet tech - to offset the vet bills but because I really believed as an animal nurse I could help.  My eyes were opened big time and my heart was broken over and over again.  Since then, I have discovered alternative health care and now I am not a good client.  I do the OPPOSITE of what my vet recommends!!  Lucky for me my vet &#8220;gets it&#8221; and is very supportive.  He is slowly going the alternative health route.  He sees my healthy pets that are not spayed, not neutered, not vaccinated, not fed dry kibble (only raw).  Actually he doesn&#8217;t see them because they don&#8217;t get sick enough to go to the vet.  My 15 1/2 year old lab cross goes for regular check ups, has gotten her teeth cleaned lately and is completely medication free.  She was spayed at 6 months but lucky for us and her, she is one of the rare success stories of modern medicine.  But she went alternative 9 years ago, so me thinks that is the secret to her longevity.  I treat with Homeopathy.  I am now a Homeopath.  I work with pets and people.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I encourage people to band together in your hometowns, find a vet you can work with and be your own pet&#8217;s advocate.  And look into homeopathy because it is a gentle for of medicine.  Go to <a href="http://www.avh.org" rel="nofollow">www.avh.org</a> to find a vet near you.  A truly holistic vet would be a support system for fighting these crazy laws and supporting you on the no spay/neuter belief system.  What is really sad is that we have to PROVE that we are good pet guardians because we do not spay/neuter our pet.  It is assumed that we are negligent.  How sad.</p>
<p>H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126841</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126841</guid>
		<description>If there is truly a dog overpopulation problem, they why aren't the shelters full of puppies! Why are people importing 'rescue' dogs? Most dogs end up in shelters because of behavior problems as a result of people not taking the time to train their dogs. People are already having trouble finding purebred dogs. Some people need or want a purebred dog because they need the predictability of working or personality traits.  Others are fine with rescue dogs from a shelter, but I have known more than one dog who was returned to the shelter because the new owner could not deal with the behavior problems the dog came with (and the reason they were initially turned in).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is truly a dog overpopulation problem, they why aren&#8217;t the shelters full of puppies! Why are people importing &#8216;rescue&#8217; dogs? Most dogs end up in shelters because of behavior problems as a result of people not taking the time to train their dogs. People are already having trouble finding purebred dogs. Some people need or want a purebred dog because they need the predictability of working or personality traits.  Others are fine with rescue dogs from a shelter, but I have known more than one dog who was returned to the shelter because the new owner could not deal with the behavior problems the dog came with (and the reason they were initially turned in).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PupDaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126685</link>
		<author>PupDaddy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126685</guid>
		<description>Just a quick response to two of the above posts - first, Medeleine I am not a breeder but an owner of 3 mixed rescue dogs. These make the 10th rescued dogs I have had in my life and all (with the exception of my youngest puppy) were altered at about six months and none have ever been bred. The others have passed at ages 13, 14, 15 ... all in old age. Some much for the theory about only breeders being against such laws. I do currently have a dog with horrendous hip dyplasia which will eventually be the death of her - if I thought I could change that for her and any other family living with this heartache I would. If having put off her altering a few months would give me more good years with her now...There's no time machine for us but perhaps others can make better educated decisions about the age of altering based on this discussion. I have no mandatory age to set for anyone else but I believe we all deserve the correct information - its your right to do what you will with the info.

Second Anon, pls do not flip about neuturing your pet at 5 months - you did what you felt was best at the time. Parents of all kinds have hindsight regrets about things but its best to move forward not back. I am sure your pet will be fine like so many others. I have changed my ideas about neuturing just in the last few months as an effort to give my dogs the best chance at optimal health and that includes nutrition, vet care etc in that goal. 

On the whole, I don't think anyone claims to have all the answers. I just can't think of any good reason not to inform people of the truth about the healthcare decisions they make for their pets. Its not judgement, just information. Best wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick response to two of the above posts - first, Medeleine I am not a breeder but an owner of 3 mixed rescue dogs. These make the 10th rescued dogs I have had in my life and all (with the exception of my youngest puppy) were altered at about six months and none have ever been bred. The others have passed at ages 13, 14, 15 &#8230; all in old age. Some much for the theory about only breeders being against such laws. I do currently have a dog with horrendous hip dyplasia which will eventually be the death of her - if I thought I could change that for her and any other family living with this heartache I would. If having put off her altering a few months would give me more good years with her now&#8230;There&#8217;s no time machine for us but perhaps others can make better educated decisions about the age of altering based on this discussion. I have no mandatory age to set for anyone else but I believe we all deserve the correct information - its your right to do what you will with the info.</p>
<p>Second Anon, pls do not flip about neuturing your pet at 5 months - you did what you felt was best at the time. Parents of all kinds have hindsight regrets about things but its best to move forward not back. I am sure your pet will be fine like so many others. I have changed my ideas about neuturing just in the last few months as an effort to give my dogs the best chance at optimal health and that includes nutrition, vet care etc in that goal. </p>
<p>On the whole, I don&#8217;t think anyone claims to have all the answers. I just can&#8217;t think of any good reason not to inform people of the truth about the healthcare decisions they make for their pets. Its not judgement, just information. Best wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126672</link>
		<author>Max</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126672</guid>
		<description>Instead of mandatory spay and neuter for all dogs and cats....which punishes the very most responsible pet owners (whose dogs may or may not be neutered and spayed based upon the importance of health factors determined by owner and vet - but who will never be bred in either case) and is prohibitive to responsible breeders dedicated to improving the breed of their choice - why not:

Make spaying and neutering free to those who cannot afford it....surely this would be far more cost effective then housing and euthanising.

Require that vets donate a few hours of their time every month for this purpose - part of licensing them to do business.

Cease importing dogs from other countries - sato dogs etc.

crack down on dog smuggling - maybe mandatory spay and neuter for  those engaging in this activity? (kidding)

Get puppy mills out of the USDA jurisdiction.

Make it illegal to sell dogs and cats in retail stores. (removes the profit from millers)

Heavy fines for those who can't afford them will only cause them to cease taking their pets to the vet when needed, and dump more pets out on the street to fend for themselves.  counterproductive and cause much suffering for formerly loved pets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of mandatory spay and neuter for all dogs and cats&#8230;.which punishes the very most responsible pet owners (whose dogs may or may not be neutered and spayed based upon the importance of health factors determined by owner and vet - but who will never be bred in either case) and is prohibitive to responsible breeders dedicated to improving the breed of their choice - why not:</p>
<p>Make spaying and neutering free to those who cannot afford it&#8230;.surely this would be far more cost effective then housing and euthanising.</p>
<p>Require that vets donate a few hours of their time every month for this purpose - part of licensing them to do business.</p>
<p>Cease importing dogs from other countries - sato dogs etc.</p>
<p>crack down on dog smuggling - maybe mandatory spay and neuter for  those engaging in this activity? (kidding)</p>
<p>Get puppy mills out of the USDA jurisdiction.</p>
<p>Make it illegal to sell dogs and cats in retail stores. (removes the profit from millers)</p>
<p>Heavy fines for those who can&#8217;t afford them will only cause them to cease taking their pets to the vet when needed, and dump more pets out on the street to fend for themselves.  counterproductive and cause much suffering for formerly loved pets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126667</link>
		<author>Anon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126667</guid>
		<description>So now do I have to freak out that I neutered one of my dogs at 5 months?  The female was an older adoption, so I'm not worried about her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now do I have to freak out that I neutered one of my dogs at 5 months?  The female was an older adoption, so I&#8217;m not worried about her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126645</link>
		<author>Jan Morgan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126645</guid>
		<description>Seems it didn't take my whole post. Here is the rest:
 ~ doubles the risk (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems it didn&#8217;t take my whole post. Here is the rest:<br />
 ~ doubles the risk (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126644</link>
		<author>Jan Morgan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126644</guid>
		<description>Seems it didn't take my whole post. Here is the rest:

 ~ doubles the small risk (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems it didn&#8217;t take my whole post. Here is the rest:</p>
<p> ~ doubles the small risk (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126642</link>
		<author>Jan Morgan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126642</guid>
		<description>Denise your vet is using the age old method of fear to scare you into early spay and neuter.  The vet is right if you remove the cervix and ovaries then there will be no hormone producing enzymes to begin the cycle of mammary tumors; however, spaying female dogs:

    ~ if done before maturity, increases the risk of osteosarcoma by
       a factor of 3.1; this is a common cancer in larger breeds with a
       poor prognosis.
    ~ increases the risk of splenic hemangiosarcoma by a factor of
       2.2 and cardiac hemangiosarcoma by a factor of &#62;5; this is a
       common cancer and major cause of death in some breeds.
    ~ triples the risk of hypothyroidism
    ~ increases the risk of obesity by a factor of 1.6-2, a common
       health problem in dogs with many associated health problems
    ~ causes urinary "spay incontinence" in 4-20% of female dogs
    ~ increases the risk of persistent or recurring urinary tract
       infections by a factor of 3-4
    ~ increases the risk of recessed vulva, vaginal dermatitis, and
       vaginitis, especially for female dogs spayed before puberty
    ~ doubles the small risk (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise your vet is using the age old method of fear to scare you into early spay and neuter.  The vet is right if you remove the cervix and ovaries then there will be no hormone producing enzymes to begin the cycle of mammary tumors; however, spaying female dogs:</p>
<p>    ~ if done before maturity, increases the risk of osteosarcoma by<br />
       a factor of 3.1; this is a common cancer in larger breeds with a<br />
       poor prognosis.<br />
    ~ increases the risk of splenic hemangiosarcoma by a factor of<br />
       2.2 and cardiac hemangiosarcoma by a factor of &gt;5; this is a<br />
       common cancer and major cause of death in some breeds.<br />
    ~ triples the risk of hypothyroidism<br />
    ~ increases the risk of obesity by a factor of 1.6-2, a common<br />
       health problem in dogs with many associated health problems<br />
    ~ causes urinary &#8220;spay incontinence&#8221; in 4-20% of female dogs<br />
    ~ increases the risk of persistent or recurring urinary tract<br />
       infections by a factor of 3-4<br />
    ~ increases the risk of recessed vulva, vaginal dermatitis, and<br />
       vaginitis, especially for female dogs spayed before puberty<br />
    ~ doubles the small risk (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126638</link>
		<author>Denise</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126638</guid>
		<description>I have had more than one vet tell me to spay/neuter becuase if the dog goes in to heat they have a higher instance of getting breast cancer (female) then one vet told me under to spay before 2years of age to prevent breast cancer. when i got my dog(pure bred) I had to sighn a spay/neuter contract. the breeder did not want her blood line comprimised.  she wants her dogs to get loving homes and not be used for breeding. I would have had her spayed anyway. Some people that having animals say in the big cities like Detroit. The dogs starve they freeze to death and they are not cared for and they do breed and they have tons of dogs running free and its dangerous and they run in packs and they attack kids and also city workers it happens all the time. the people that get the animals don't take care of them. even if they got the spay and nueter free they might not. they shouldn't have animals and can't afford them and don't know how to take care of them. just watch animal cops Detroit. those dogs and cats are frozen to death and they have to pick them up right in the peoples back yard. They get these animals and just tie them out there with no shelter food or water. I am not sure what the answer is but I think the city of Los Angeles is just trying to cut down on the amount of animals they have to kill. its said those animals have a right to be loved but i have seen people have litter after litter and not spay or neuter. a lot of these animals end up in shelters. a few years ago we had a female cat running lose in our neighborhood. the kittens were wild litter after litter. They came and trapped them becuase they were finding cats with rabies around here. its so sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had more than one vet tell me to spay/neuter becuase if the dog goes in to heat they have a higher instance of getting breast cancer (female) then one vet told me under to spay before 2years of age to prevent breast cancer. when i got my dog(pure bred) I had to sighn a spay/neuter contract. the breeder did not want her blood line comprimised.  she wants her dogs to get loving homes and not be used for breeding. I would have had her spayed anyway. Some people that having animals say in the big cities like Detroit. The dogs starve they freeze to death and they are not cared for and they do breed and they have tons of dogs running free and its dangerous and they run in packs and they attack kids and also city workers it happens all the time. the people that get the animals don&#8217;t take care of them. even if they got the spay and nueter free they might not. they shouldn&#8217;t have animals and can&#8217;t afford them and don&#8217;t know how to take care of them. just watch animal cops Detroit. those dogs and cats are frozen to death and they have to pick them up right in the peoples back yard. They get these animals and just tie them out there with no shelter food or water. I am not sure what the answer is but I think the city of Los Angeles is just trying to cut down on the amount of animals they have to kill. its said those animals have a right to be loved but i have seen people have litter after litter and not spay or neuter. a lot of these animals end up in shelters. a few years ago we had a female cat running lose in our neighborhood. the kittens were wild litter after litter. They came and trapped them becuase they were finding cats with rabies around here. its so sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126629</link>
		<author>Sammy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.itchmo.com/los-angeles-passes-pet-sterilization-law-4808#comment-126629</guid>
		<description>I would like for everyone to do one thing, go to your local shelters asap and report back to the rest of us how full these shelters are. Also be sure to find out where the animals came from, ie, are they locals or imported from other states and or countries. I think you all may be surprised at what you find out.

One more thing, please tell me why people agree to have mandatory anything for an entire society because some folks are irresponsible. So we punish everyone is that it? Well then because teenagers who drink and drive cause more fatalities then we should have a law that states no teenager is allowed to drive, lets punish them all, same kind of thinking.

And why is it illegal to profile or discriminate but the ar zealots are allowed to claim all breeders are horrible and we should ban breeding. Oh let me guess that is not discriminatory. 

What has happened to America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like for everyone to do one thing, go to your local shelters asap and report back to the rest of us how full these shelters are. Also be sure to find out where the animals came from, ie, are they locals or imported from other states and or countries. I think you all may be surprised at what you find out.</p>
<p>One more thing, please tell me why people agree to have mandatory anything for an entire society because some folks are irresponsible. So we punish everyone is that it? Well then because teenagers who drink and drive cause more fatalities then we should have a law that states no teenager is allowed to drive, lets punish them all, same kind of thinking.</p>
<p>And why is it illegal to profile or discriminate but the ar zealots are allowed to claim all breeders are horrible and we should ban breeding. Oh let me guess that is not discriminatory. </p>
<p>What has happened to America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
