Comments on: Superior Court Judge Releases Congo The Dog Back To Owners

By: moth

moth — Wed, 07 May 2008 20:17:44 +0000

Congo should definetely not be euthanized, any dog would act the way congo did. The landscapers caused the problem not the dogs.The landscapers should be ashamed of what he did the dogs and the family.

By: moth

moth — Wed, 07 May 2008 20:15:12 +0000

idiot!

By: Fed Up

Fed Up — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:36:13 +0000

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
June 23, 2006
M-06-16
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
FROM: Clay Johnson III
Deputy Director for Management
SUBJECT: Protection of Sensitive Agency Information
In an effort to properly safeguard our information assets while using information technology, it is essential for all departments and agencies to know their baseline of activities.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provided a checklist for protection of remote information. (See attachment) The intent of implementing the checklist is to compensate for the lack of physical security controls when information is removed from, or accessed from outside the agency location. In addition to using the NIST checklist, I am recommending all departments and agencies take the following actions:
1. Encrypt all data on mobile computers/devices which carry agency data unless the data is determined to be non-sensitive, in writing, by your Deputy Secretary or an individual he/she may designate in writing;
2. Allow remote access only with two-factor authentication where one of the factors is provided by a device separate from the computer gaining access;
3. Use a â€œtime-outâ€ function for remote access and mobile devices requiring user re-authentication after 30 minutes inactivity; and
4. Log all computer-readable data extracts from databases holding sensitive information and verify each extract including sensitive data has been erased within 90 days or its use is still required.
Most departments and agencies have these measures already in place. We intend to work with the Inspectors General community to review these items as well as the checklist to ensure we are properly safeguarding the information the American taxpayer has entrusted to us. Please ensure these safeguards have been reviewed and are in place within the next 45 days.
Attachment

By: Fed Up

Fed Up — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:33:46 +0000

Illigal American says:

December 3rd, 2007 at 2:09 am
Kill The damn dog!! What are you Hicks thinking??? Stop screwing your sister and open your eyes to the real story. The dog bit someone, put it downâ€¦ Hello illegal or not. It doesnâ€™t matter. Plus All the jobs being done by these illegals are things lazy Americans in the US would never want to do! I know I wouldnâ€™t!

Go home!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we hate you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by by by by byb

By: Helen

Helen — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:35:26 +0000

Congo is a good pet , in a family that loves him very much. he is not a predator, looking for someone to attack. Congo should live. and people should have respect for Gods animals instead of teasing them.

By: Donna

Donna — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:39:19 +0000

Sounds to me that the public NEEDS to support Ron Paul for president.He is pro america and will close the boarders.This will ensure security and stop any more of our animals from having to protect americans from illegal attacks and will reduce the crime rate. Congo did what is right for a dog that percieved his owner to be in danger.The illegal,…….is a criminal.No money should have been awarded.Sue the company that hired him.Remember,………….RON PAUL for president.He will set america back on track and bring border security. And………………… he belives in the constitution !

By: Kristen

Kristen — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:26:40 +0000

Save the dog! Congo was just doing his job, nobody has any right to euthunize him. He wasn’t doing anything wrong at all. The judge should start thinking a little bit more. The man H-I-T the dog with a rake. So in other words he asked for what he got. He provoked the dog, & the dog protected his property. Any one who is against Congo needs to understand that none of this was his fault. The gardener shouldnt have even been at the lady’s home yet anyways. SAVE CONGO!

By: C1982

C1982 — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:43:57 +0000

The immigrant is here illegally!!! Come here the right way and maybe the illegal part wouldn’t be such a problem… Yes we were all immigrants that are here legally and pay taxes, why shouldn’t they have to, instead of living off of us. Give him his money and send him back to where he belongs!!!! We (the taxpayers) can be as judgemental as we want when are people are the ones paying!!! Support Congo’s Law!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:53:55 +0000

So insurance pays out to someone who is an illegal and was illegally on someones property because the dog bite him protecting his master. this whole case makes no sense, dirtbag is here illegally, owner tells him in spanish to stay in the car and dumb ass still gets out and then has the balls to grab the wife and throw her to the ground and the dog is suppose to do nothing. Part of the problem is that the dog is a German Shepherd, if a Lab had done it, then it becomes heroic, a GSD, Rott etc. then it is vicious. Dog should get a medal and a lifetime of free dog food, illegal should be sent back, minus the money

By: amimal lover

amimal lover — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:14:48 +0000

To Illegal… Your not an American. You are an illegal alien…….. if you do not like us hicks…. or our laws… or our lazy people… give me your address… I personally will purchase the ticket to fly you back where you belong.. I am tired of the illegals who come here to milk the system complain… Go back we will do better without you.

By: Fed Up

Fed Up — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:48:11 +0000

The landscape company should be sued for assault to the homeowner since the worker pushed her to the ground, for their workers tresspassing when they were told not to come onto the property, and for hiring illegals. Since when does an illegal have any rights in this country; they are here illegally. They chose to ignore the homeowner and came on to the property so they got what they deserved. Why is it permissible for an illegal to break the law and collect money and for law biding citizens to be penalized. Send the illegals back to their country and make them go thru the process of entering the US legally like all of the other immigrants. Then vote all of our representatives who are not representing the American citizens out of office.

By: Illigal American

Illigal American — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:09:41 +0000

Kill The damn dog!! What are you Hicks thinking??? Stop screwing your sister and open your eyes to the real story. The dog bit someone, put it down… Hello illegal or not. It doesn’t matter. Plus All the jobs being done by these illegals are things lazy Americans in the US would never want to do! I know I wouldn’t!

By: just.sayin

just.sayin — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 06:06:21 +0000

I can’t keep up with you guys! Rock? what rock? Did you see the story which states that Mr. Rivera works for a company owned by Mr. James’ brother. Handout? What handout? The Gardener works hard for a low wage so that James’ brother can profit. Would a manual laborer who can be deported thousands of miles away really come to their house for ill will? The guy got out of his car for a second session of work. He had a rake and was attacked by six German Shepherds (maybe five) because one was out running loose around this time. The guy could have defended himself with his rake against one but not the whole pack. Mrs. James could not call them off so he hid behind her. She fell and now you all have it as an illegal alien came over and attacked the wife. German Shepherds are a great breed but there are a few of them that get a little extreme in the territorial dept. Any comment on the Jameses hiring illegals (causing) the problem, No rabies vaccinations for their dogs causing Mr. Rivera to go through the whole rabies vaccine series, Their loose dog (out of the yard) while Mr. James still has time to shower, Hiring a crew to work in a yard full of loose attack dogs (yes they did)?

By: just.sayin

just.sayin — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:40:35 +0000

I am an American soldier of Mexican decent. I am for secure borders and believe that the majority of illegal aliens are good, hard working people. They circumvent the system because it is beyond their means to do otherwise. I helped someone gain legal residency and later citizenship. It was crazy hard to do. Every time you submit a form you have to pay a ‘processing fee’ reaching in the thousands of dollars. On my soldiers salary, it took me a very long time to afford it. The laws were changing faster than I could raise the money and it caused me to pay even more. Later, I tried to research how many soldiers have died in our current conflicts that were resident aliens and given citizenship posthumously. I have also tried to find out how much money the U.S. gains in unclaimed income tax because illegal aliens can not file a claim from their ‘made up’ SS#. I never found out but can guess that the figures are astounding. Be against them by all legal means; but not by being ugly toward your fellow man. Research the dog story and you will see that Congo, the other five German Shepherds and Mr. Rivera are victims of the homeowners negligence. Mr. Rivera hold no ill will toward the dog. The dogs can be sparred either by gubernatorial pardon or simply by Mr. James swallowing his pride and accepting the vicious dog restrictions. Change the law and you’ll be reading about more irresponsible pet owners claiming that their pets were provoked by any imagined gesture.

By: amimal lover

amimal lover — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:51:09 +0000

TO MIKE C YOUR THE IDIOT. THEY DID NOT HIRE HIM, THEY HIRED THE COMPANY HE WORKS FOR. THE COMPANY HIRED THE ILLEGAL, AND WAKE UP. THESE GUYS BUY SSN AND GREENCARD. TODAY JOSE TOMORROW MANUEL. THEY CAN EVADE JUST ABOUT ANYTHING WITH A FEW BUCKS AND A NAME CHANGE. THE ILLEGALS ACTIONS WERE SHOWING THE BLATANT DISRESPECT TO THE COUNTRY WHO GIVES THEM THE HANDOUT